A Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The Houses joint resolution proposing a balanced budget amendment (BBA), H.J. Res. 2, would have amended the U.S. Constitution to require that federal spending in any fiscal year not exceed that years revenues, unless three-fifths of the members of both houses of Congress agreed to additional spending.[1] Additionally, the amendment would have required a three-fifths vote in both houses to increase the national debt limit or to pass a law increasing revenue.[2]

Because the BBA would have required that all spending be offset by revenues collected in the same yearregardless of the state of the economyadoption of the amendment would have resulted in tipping weak economies into recession, making recessions longer and deeper, and causing large job losses.[3] The amendment also would have weakened the stability of banks, thrift institutions, and some private pension systems.[4]

Additionally, the law would have jeopardized many of the programs that serve low-income Americans. Under the amendment, if revenues were to dropas they have during the current economic downturnspending on vital public programs would have to be cut immediately. By requiring cuts in spending to programs like Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and unemployment insurance in times of economic downturn, the amendment would have diminished these programs at the very time they are needed most. The BBA also would have cut Social Security benefits that Americans have earned, even if Social Security had ample reserves in its trust funds.[5] Likewise, the amendment would have interfered with the military and civil service retirement systems, which also have their own trust funds.[6]

The joint resolution did not receive the 2/3 vote required for passage.[7] The Senate also rejected a joint resolution proposing a different BBA, S.J. Res. 10. The Senate vote on S.J. Res. 10 is included in the 2011 Poverty Scorecard.[8]

For more information

» Visit govtrack.us
Detailed information about the bill, including full text, floor speeches, sponsors and more

» Toggle footnotes

Legend

= vote to fight poverty = vote against fighting poverty = no vote